Nike Armour: Why Acquiring Under Armour would be in Nike’s Best Interest

080_nike_lebron3_04After researching both Nike (NKE) and Under Armour (UA) recently I think Nike needs to start realizing the benefits to be had if they were to purchase Under Armour. This would be a big acquisition and I believe it could help secure Nike’s dominance for the next decade or so.

Why Nike Should be Interested?

As of right now, Nike has tried to duplicate many of Under Armour’s top products such as Cold Gear and Heat Gear. So far they have had very little success in taking away any form of market share against these products. Adding to the concerns to Nike Investors, Under Armour has been dominating the younger generations, 25 years below. Another recent concern was the release of Under Armour’s running shoes and cleats. This has to be a threat to the long-term value of Nike. Right now this isn’t a concern to Nike, however with the younger consumers wearing Under Armour’s brand the momentum is in their favor to one day steal a large piece of the pie.

What Nike would have to do?

For Nike to have any chance at buying Under Armour, the deal would need to happen soon. Under Armour is still several years away from being aUnderArmour major threat to Nike, however by that time it will be to late for Nike to make any form of move. Right now Nike is sitting on roughly $3 billion in cash. This could be used to acquire Under Armour even at their current depressed price. As long as Nike could offer a premium price to entice shareholders to sell all would be set. Currently, insiders own less than 7% of the company. That would make it difficult for Under Armour’s CEO Kevin Plank to put up much of a fight against Nike. He would need to have a killer speech to explain to shareholders why Under Armour will be better off not selling. Going against both the uncertainties of the economy and the retail sector, this would be a hard sell. Plus with the current cash problems Under Armour is having, sale would make sense.

Nike Needs to Act Fast

battle-nike-underarmour-200x267drNike needs to take advantage of the depressed consumer spending market to acquire Under Armour. Currently, they are an iconic global brand and have both the management and the balance sheet to make such a move. Nike could help introduce Under Armour to the developing nations, a sector Nike has had recent success in. Purchasing Under Armour right away will give Nike time to introduce the brand and help decrease competition. Obviously, we know over time Nike could beat Under Armour but instead they should acquire them at a discounted price and use the brand as an asset. This would also ensure Nike keeps growing. Currently I am holding neither company. However, Nike should definitely take a serious look at this acquisition before they are fighting head to head against Under Armour for sales.

Recap of Stock Picks: What to do with your Positions

Related posts:

  1. Protect this House: Sell Under Armour at $32-$33

Filed Under: FeaturedTechnology | Retail

Tags: Nike Acquiring Under ArmourNike ArmourNike Purchasing Under ArmourNike vs Under Armour

  • Matt

    Plank controls almost 90% of the voting shares, so the only speech needed is a one work answer. UA is debt free but is short of cash, and has overextended itself a bit, but has a $200MM credit line as a safety net. There will not be a merger with a $2B company and an $800MM company…only a possible sale, and Plank has the final sale. Also, Nike’s Softhand Drifit product is gaining significant traction. Nike will pass on UA.

    • http://stocksonwallstreet.net James

      The cash problem will become a problem eventually if Under Armour continues to over-extend themselves to keep up with competitors. One thing though to correct you Nike’s market cap is $35.1 billion compared to Under Armour at $1.2 billion.

  • Plank

    What cash problems do you speak of for UA? They have zero debt.

    • http://stocksonwallstreet.net James

      Under Armour under-budgeted marketing costs and now has over-committed in likes of commercials, sponsorships of college teams, etc.

      • Plank

        They raised guidance, have zero debt and believe it or not, those college sponsorships are profitable or you wouldn’t see any of those deals happen, regardless if its UA, Nike or Adidas.

        • http://stocksonwallstreet.net James

          The deals aren’t profitable as they make $0 off them, they are wrote off as an advertising expense and looked good upon that way.

  • http://RandomChatter.org Alex

    I believe Nike is seeing how the land lays.
    As for the duplications ?
    Just testing the waters to see if it is a sales success.I think the acquisition is still up in the air for Nike.Not all acquisitions stories ends happy ever after.Years ago the Ames stores acquired a successful smaller store chain called Hills.In short,it turned out to be disastrous for Ames,which led to it’s closing. I think this may be on the minds of Nike.
    It’s a monetary game of chance.Let’s not forget other shoe chains standing on the outside looking in…It’s a waiting game.

    • http://stocksonwallstreet.net James

      True big risk though I believe Under Armour has proved their brand can sell which should entice Nike.

  • http://stocksonwallstreet.net James

    What are your thoughts on a Nike, Under Armour merger?

© 2009-2010 Stocks on Wall Street, LLC. All Rights Reserved.           Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | About Us | Sitemap

Affiliate Disclosure: It is advisable to assume that any mention of a product or service on this website is made because there exist, unless otherwise stated, a material connection between the product or service owners and this website and should you make a purchase of a product or service described here the owner of this website may be compensated. To learn more please Click Here: Disclosure